If you take recommendations to grade, please please please grade this video. What the heck is that URL? >> Pedophilia pisses me off because it's one of those topics that you can't even talk about. If you make any kind of comment that sounds remotely like you don't absolutely despise pedophiles, then everyone's knee-jerk reaction is to call you a pedophile >> This is going to be fucking good. Hello everybody. Welcome back to another installment of grading YouTube essays. And today we have a really good one. Um Before we start, first off, thank you Chad for emailing me this uh video. >> >> I knew this video was out there, but I I I couldn't remember enough details to find it again. But Chad came in clutch with um sending me a URL to it. And as you can see, we are back on Internet Archive, which means it's going to be a good one. I genuinely think this one might be worse than Achilles heel, so anyway, with further ado, let's start. >> Pedophilia pisses me off because it's one of those topics that you can't even talk about. If you make any kind of comment that sounds remotely like you don't absolutely despise pedophiles, then everyone's knee-jerk reaction is to call you a pedophile by association. >> >> This one's generally hard to grade cuz I'm so fucking taken aback by his argument. Okay, let's talk tone. Um So he he throughout this video, he's going to paint himself as like this kind of victim where he's like standing up for the underdog. Like it like it's the fucking Sandlot, and he's rooting for the poor kids, right? The poor kids in this case being uh pedophiles. So, just immediately off rip, I mean, you just look at the title. There's no way anyone is ever going to take this seriously, let alone that it's improperly capitalized. I'm just going to give fucking minus like 15 for tone cuz like there is absolutely no way that a person with a dragon furry avatar could upload a video titled in defense of pedophiles and think that anyone was actually going to hear out their argument. And I I I really really really tried to, and um it's a really hard it it's it's generally really hard, not even because like it's a bad argument, but because it's it's so hard to like pay attention to it cuz he says so much shit that makes me go, "What the fuck?" So, as we're going to see, the tone in this fucking essay is atrocious. >> to preface every single sentence with, "I don't find kids attractive and I don't support pedophiles." Just so people will listen to you. But, I've said before that I'm not attracted to humans, period. >> Oh, my fucking Take another fucking 10 off for tone, bro. I don't give a shit if you're not attracted to humans. Again, it's No one is ever going to take him seriously. Hey guys, um here's a my video. Ah, I really don't like pedophilia. Okay, that's good. Because whenever you talk about it, people think that if you don't like it, then you're a pedophile. And immediately they're running out of your town. They're running you out of town. And then combine that with his furry fucking dragon avatar and then how he just said that, "I'm not even attracted to humans myself." Like there's there's no way. There's no way. This is so shit. It's it's it's It's terrible. It's horrible. >> And I assume that people who watch my videos know that entertaining a thought does not mean that you necessarily agree with a thought. So, there are several kinds of pedophiles. There are pedophiles which are people attracted to young kids such as a 30-year-old wanting to have sex with an 8-year-old. There are child molesters who are 30-year-olds who actually do have sex with 8-year-olds. And then there are pedophiles by technicality, which is something like a 20-year-old wanting to have sex with a 16-year-old. And >> Okay. Some of you might be thinking, "Hey Jamie, since you gave a definition, you should give him plus points." No. Um I'm taking some off for fucking reasoning, actually. Uh that last one, there's people that are technically pedophiles because they're only 20 and they had sex with like a high schooler, you know? And they're technically pedophiles. Um that's a That's That's a terrible definition. That is by definition pedophilia. Like if you look at pedophilia, it's want to have sex with kids. Sexual attraction towards kids. That is an adult wanting to have sex with a kid. That's pedophilia. So, this whole like if we really look into it, we can see the gray zone in the the the the more specific types of pedophilia and people are only technically pedophiles and this No, no, no, no, no. It's pedophilia. His def He's trying to redefine something horrifically. And it's And again, this is also his opinion, but he's trying to present it as fact. So, he doesn't even like He doesn't source like the FBI's definition of pedophilia or like APA's definition of pedophilia or like any state's definition of pedophilia. He's just saying that actually, this is the technicality. No, there's not. To anyone in the audience, there's no fucking technicalities to pedophilia. You're a pedophile if you commit statutory rape. So, um we're going to take five off reasoning. >> This is also called ephebophilia. What irks me about our society is that it doesn't matter which one of these you are. It doesn't matter if you actually commit the crime, because even if you think about it, you are still seen as just as bad. Now, I have nothing to say in defense of child molesters. They are weak people and have irreparably damaged another human. >> That is the only good point he's going to make. >> I don't see them as any different than rapists. But >> Okay. >> >> I'll give him I'm going to write definition again. Here Here's definition. Some of you might be thinking, well, what did he define there? Um, it's cuz I'm not adding points. I'm taking points off. Um Someone that sexually assaults a child is by definition a rapist. So again, he's trying to categorize it like it's something else. Like, I see these people no different as rapists. They are rapists. So he's he's trying to like add these categories that are not only unneeded, but over complicates his argument. It's like is some of them are technical and these people aren't rapists, but I view them the same as a rapist. No, it's statutory rape. Call it what it is. It's statutory rape. Ah, fuck. This one is not getting fucking monetized, is it? But, um, yeah, so I'm actually going to take some off for definition. >> For those who simply have the thought of being attracted to kids, I have sympathy for because sexuality isn't a choice. It's something that is part of you and you can't get rid of it. And there are no real options for people who are attracted to kids. You have to keep it to yourself for fear of society branding you as a child molester or a fear of being on some kind of watch list for a crime that you have never committed. >> Okay, this is where I'm going to get him for source. Admitting that you enjoy having or you find sexual attraction from children is the same as being put on a list. What list? Like people might avoid you, but like like no one's going to put you on like a maybe some people, but even then like you're not citing any evidence. So, he's kind of just assuming that like man, pedophile pedophiles really get the short end of the stick. Anyway, um here's why we should be more accepting of them. Yeah, no. There's there's there's ways to have arguments about how society treats pedophiles and this is not fucking one of them. Let me tell you, this is not one of them. >> The way I see some people react to them sickens me more than the thought of pedophilia itself. >> Oh my god. Oh my god. What? >> >> The way some people talk about pedophilia makes me angrier than actual child rape. What are you saying? Genuinely, what the fuck are you saying, dude? Oh my god. Oh my god. I'm taking more off for tone cuz again, it's it is no one is ever going to fucking take this seriously. There's a reason this video is not on fucking YouTube anymore. It's cuz it's horrible. The tone is atrocious. >> Because they are so harshly judged and hated and rarely is that hatred about kids being hurt or exploited or actual things that I could understand feeling hatred about. >> Okay, first off, minus three for source. You're just assuming that people don't like pedophiles just cuz they want to hate something. And also secondly, and this isn't going to be um part of the my grading. This is my opinion. Um, shut the fuck up. I don't like pedophiles cuz they hurt kids, not cuz I want to hate people. This argument is horrible. >> Their hatred is because their sensibilities have been offended and because it's socially acceptable to hate that person. And all for having a thought and desires that they can't control. I've heard people say that pedophiles deserve to be tortured and killed. Now, I don't believe in the death sentence even for mass murderers, much less for >> Fuck is this guy's moral compass? The way some people treat pedophiles is worse than pedophilia and child rape. I also don't believe in the death penalty, even for mass murderers. What the fuck is this guy's moral compass? Oh my god. >> for a person who has not even committed a crime. In the case of pedophiles by technicality, that is someone like a 20-year-old having sex WITH A 16-YEAR-OLD. >> >> THAT'S NOT A TECHNICALITY. THAT'S RAPE. That's just rape. That is statutory rape. Get ready. He's about to say something even fucking crazier. >> world. I find the reactions of people even more disturbing because once again, it is people holding the law as a moral authority. I certainly believe that you should follow laws, but not all laws should be taken as this divine voice. Not all laws are ethical or even make sense. Why does the law >> Okay, hold on. Hold on to that point. He's saying that you cannot set the law as a moral authority. Get ready for that cuz he's about to fucking do it. >> law decide that a person becomes an adult at age 18. There is no magical leap of maturity because the sun has revolved around the planet exactly 18 times since they were born. Based on personal experience, I would say that between the ages of 16 and 22, most people I have met don't have drastic changes in their maturity level. >> Yo, what fucking universe do you live in? What fucking planet is this guy on? 16-year-olds and 22-year-olds don't have much of a difference in maturity? What What the fuck is he smoking? He's on that like fucking fent 2.0, bro. What And also And just anecdote, too. And I'm going to give a fucking big for anecdote, cuz that's crazy. Um 16-year-olds and 22-year-olds are similar in levels of maturity? What the fuck are you saying, dude? And keep in mind, a 16-year-old is a high school student. A 22-year-old is probably working a full-time job or a full-time student. Or the A 22-year-old is usually graduating college if they go for a 4-year degree right after high school. And he's saying that there is no maturity difference whatsoever. Uh-uh. Mm-mm. Nope. No, sir. Let's continue. >> The age of consent being 18 strikes me as odd. Shouldn't the age that you are allowed to have sex be based on when you reach sexual maturity? Why is it considered such a moral crime and a sick thing to like a 16-year-old? >> Cuz it's fucking gross. That's why, dude. It's fucking gross, okay? Because as a society, we all came together through our representatives, and we've said, "You know what? 18 is going to be the cutoff." That's when you finish high school. That's usually when you're doing start doing your own thing. Um >> >> Yeah, so the reason society shuns it is cuz a 16-year-old is pretty pretty much going They're still a kid. They're still a fucking kid. A 16-year-old is a child. That's why. And also, he's saying, "Well, shouldn't it be on sexual maturity? Who fucking gets to decide that? You? I don't fucking want that." Oh my god, dude. So, I'm going to take some of the reasoning cuz like, uh why is it 18? Because our elected representatives have decided so. So, it is the majority opinion. >> Attractiveness and beauty standards are almost always measured by youth. Pornography distributors especially value youth. And the reason is because we have a natural drive and instinct to breed with those who are young and fertile. >> Oh my god. It's so bad. What should I even put that in? I could put it in a source cuz he doesn't source it. I could put it in for tone cuz it's fucking disgusting. Um reasoning because just cuz you may naturally want to do something, that doesn't mean you should do something. I think I'm going to put minus 15 for tone and it's going to be for tone, reasoning, and source. That was one of the grossest fucking things I've ever heard. >> Some states, the legal age of consent is 16, and yet you're still viewed as some kind of sicko for being attracted to someone of that age because the general population thinks that 18 is the age of consent everywhere. In Japan, the age of consent is 13, which many Americans view as sick and twisted, but I'm sure the Japanese just see it as normal and consider Americans exceptional prudes. >> Okay, so this is what I'm saying. Remember, he just previously said that you cannot cite the law's morality. But then he's saying, "Why are people getting pissed off when it is legal to have sex with a 16-year-old?" The law says 16, so I so I should be allowed to do this morally. So, he just contradicted himself. His whole argument that well guys, I have this crazy thought that maybe our morality shouldn't be based off the laws of man. Fucking unique idea there. They definitely haven't been fucking uh thinking about that since the ancient days. No, sir. You're the first one ever fucking think of that. And um Yeah, and then you just did that. You just did that. Well, some states say it's 16. Therefore, if I go to fucking wherever, I should be able to fuck all the kids I want. So, I'm going to take off 20 for reasoning cuz that is a huge contradiction in his argument. >> Now, why am I defending pedophiles? Well, the truth is it's not really about pedophiles. >> The hatred and stigma attached to pedophilia is just one example of a problem in our society. And that problem is people taking the letter of the law as an absolute moral authority. And at the same time, hating anyone who so much as disagrees with that divine voice of the law. You do not have to agree with that. >> You don't have to suddenly love people who have sexual fetishes that you find disgusting. >> crazy. >> But I think you should consider one thing. 150 years ago, it was considered disgusting for >> Fuck off. Fuck off. No. No. I'm going to get him on source and I'm going to give minus fucking 10 cuz this is crazy. So, for those who don't know who these two people are, this is Mr. and Mrs. Loving from the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia, where the Supreme Court ruled that uh interracial marriage was constitutionally protected in that states cannot um discriminate on race even if it applies to both races equally. First off, it didn't happen 150 years ago. Happened in '67. So, what is that? 60, roughly? Secondly, um they're also both adults. And race is an arbitrary characteristic. So, the fact that he's trying to tie this to that is frankly disgusting. >> a white woman to like a black man. 50 years ago, it was considered disgusting and even a mental illness for a man to like another man. What happens when the law >> I'm also going to get him on source again. He like at least cite a fucking law that says that. And now he's bringing up fucking 1984. Oh my god. >> And social stigma isn't on your side. What if it was considered a crime to be religious? That even if you don't practice this illegal activity, just having the thought of loving your God is considered disgusting and a mental illness. What if the perfectly consensual, legal pornography that you like is suddenly considered criminal and disgusting and devious by the government? What if suddenly you're considered a disgusting and evil individual because of the color of your skin or your gender? >> up? >> So, once again, I do not ask that you suddenly love pedophiles. I don't ask that you tolerate crime. I suppose I just want people to feel some amount of understanding and compassion for those whose thoughts and desires don't line up with their own sensibilities. And maybe have some faith in others that even though they may have unsavory desires, it does not mean that they will act on them. Thoughts and desires alone don't make you an evil person. >> Why are we staring at each other? But Okay, I guess he really wanted us to think about that. Um Again, it's just it's so hard to even like digest his argument because it's like look at what he's saying. Guys, people used to be racist. What if people said that your race is fucking disgusting? Anyway, this is why we should um pedophiles, you know, we should be more accepting of them in our society. A false equivalency much? Um I don't even know what to say. I honestly don't. That video is so fucking funny. Dude, holy shit. Holy shit. Society discriminating against pedophiles is not the same as society discriminating based on race. Let's just make that clear. Anyway, that was horrible. Let's add it up. I didn't even fucking go over thesis. I was so distracted by the tone. I didn't even say anything for thesis, but let's let's add it up. 50 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 0 2 out of And I'm probably just going to put a picture of the big E down there. Um so yeah, so the tone is terrible. I I I I I I can't take him seriously. He's a blue fucking furry dragon. There's no way on earth I was ever going to be able to take this seriously. Especially when he opens, like that fucking opening line is insane. >> Pedophilia pisses me off because it's one of those topics that you can't even talk about. If you make any kind of comment that sounds remotely like you don't absolutely despise pedophiles, then everyone's knee-jerk >> Automatically, 99% of fucking audience hates you after saying that. That is a terrible introduction. Horrible fucking introduction. So the tone is just fucking out the window. Your reasoning is terrible. You You basically go, "Well, we used to be mean because of race. Therefore, we shouldn't be mean because of pedophilia." And then, it was also, "You shouldn't hold the law as divine word. But also, these in these jurisdictions that allow me to have sex with 16-year-olds, why do people get pissed off? I'm following the law." So, it's it's bad his de- Again, why why would you try and like cut out subsect of pedophiles? Like, "Well, you know, 20 and 16, come on. That's too close to consider pedophilia." No, that's fucking pedophilia. That's a child. Doesn't source a single fucking thing. This is just terrible. And it's like it's it's so terrible, I have a hard time even understanding what he's saying. Because I'm so Like, a bunch of people said the Achilles Argyle guy, the feet were to distract you from a shitty argument. Th- This is that for me. Where it's just off rip, his opening statement completely fucking distracts me. And it took me like watching this five times through to finally be able to understand what the fuck he was saying cuz I just I couldn't I couldn't I was laughing and cringing through the whole fucking thing. Um So, yeah, this is terrible. Th- This is horrible. This This Oh my god, this is like This is why you need to be very careful when you talk about sensitive topics. Because if you don't, you are going to make a lot of your audience immediately fucking hate you. And it's also why you should do research so that you don't make stupid fucking opinions. Like, "We should be more forgiving of pedophiles. So what? They want to just go around and fuck kids." And also, having sex with kids, I view that the same as rape. It's basically rape. It is rape. Ah. This is terrible. But, thank you all for listening. Um don't send any hate his way. I've been seeing some comments I have not been liking. So, do not send any hate to him. Um and I I I really don't know what else to say, man. This this is fucking bad. This is fucking bad. This is bad. Be careful with your tone when you go to write on a controversial topic. That's the lesson of today's video. Always be mindful of the context and your tone. With that, I hope you guys have a great day. And um yeah, this guy doesn't think a 20-year-old having sex with a 16-year-old is rape.
Hello everyone, welcome to number eight! This one is a real treat I think, and we'll all learn some important lessons about tone while also being disgusted. He really starts going off the deep end in the second half. For a better analysis on his actual argument, watch the follow-up video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QbINnr3w4w As usual, do NOT send hate or harass. This video did in fact get limited ads... References Child Protection Restoration and Penalties Enhancement Act of 1990, 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (1990). 18 USC 2251: Sexual exploitation of children Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). Licenses Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/giulio-fazio/lulu-swing License code: ETUPWQ3UZKCSZJMW License code: LGTSL5CIGQHKHLFJ Timestamps 00:00 Lore 00:26 Intro 01:12 Video Start 10:25 End of any Nuance in his Argument 18:52 Staring Contest 19:06 Tally and Conclusion